The Hobart Stadium Debate

The Financial Reality

I firmly believe Tasmania cannot afford the proposed AFL stadium. With our current financial situation showing significant strain, I point to key economic concerns:

  • Saul Eslake’s report reveals Tasmania already spends more per capita on infrastructure than any other state
  • Government spending has led to sharply increasing debt, projected to reach $16 billion within a decade
  • Annual debt servicing costs are expected to exceed $730 million before adding stadium costs

A Question of Priorities

I question whether a stadium should take precedence over essential services:

“We have a hospital system under strain, a massive housing shortage, and an education system that is failing Tasmanian kids, but that is clearly not where the government’s priorities lie.”

The Real Cost

The significant trade-off involved cannot be ignored:

“$750 million could buy you either one stadium OR:

  • 10,000 nurses
  • 9,000 teachers
  • 3,000 homes”

The AFL Deal

I am critical of the arrangement with the AFL:

  • No other Australian state has built a billion-dollar stadium at the AFL’s request
  • Tasmania will spend millions annually servicing an AFL team that will likely draft only two Tasmanian players per year
  • Taxpayers appear to be subsidizing even the empty seats

My Conclusion

“It’s not good enough. Tasmanians are concerned, and the cost of the stadium is simply too much.”